July 6: ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
ON THIS DAY IN 1867, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reported, “Half a dozen fires and twice as many accidents represent the damage done in this city by the indiscriminate use of firearms and firecrackers on the Fourth of July. Superintendent Kennedy’s order, it seems, was not enforced in Brooklyn, but the belief that it would be operated in favor of a quiet Fourth. We trust we have had the last of the noisy folly, and that next year Mr. Kennedy, encouraged by the result of his order in New York, and by the general approval it met with from the public, will take steps next year to prevent the use of firearms altogether on the Fourth of July in the two cities. During the day there is no excuse whatever for the explosion of gunpowder. We can imagine no more ridiculous sight than an overgrown boy parading the streets with his gun or pistol, loading and firing on his march, and bringing terror and unrest wherever he goes. … After nightfall fireworks may be in order, and display enough can be made to arouse the patriotism of juveniles. To the nervous and the sick the day is one anticipated with terror. We may be thankful for escaping so well under all the circumstances, but we look for a quiet Fourth as one of the reforms we shall be grateful to the police authorities for.”
***
ON THIS DAY IN 1880, the Eagle reported, “The practice of dumping offal too near our shores is having the very undesirable effect of attracting sharks to the waters of the bay in unusual numbers. Several have been seen recently near the seashore watering places, and have greatly frightened the bathers. This morning, Dr. Nagle, the Registrar of Vital Statistics for New York, returning from Long Branch in the steamer St. John, saw a shark fully ten feet long. Its large fin projected above the water and first attracted attention to the fish that followed the boat close under its side for a considerable distance. It was watched curiously by the passengers on the steamer, who tried to frighten it away by shouts and gestures, but the fish kept lazily on its course, apparently unconcerned.”