February 13: ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
ON THIS DAY IN 1844, a Brooklyn Daily Eagle editorial said, βSt. Valentine. β Tomorrow is the festival of this distinguished saint β who, as all the world knows, extends his patronage to ladies fair and bachelors crusty. Myriads of heads are at this moment aching with poetical thoughts, and some of them would doubtless explode, in consequence of being βunused to the (rhyming and the) melting mood,β were they not encircled by strings or bands, under pretense of keeping the hair in its place. The booksellersβ windows are ornamented with Valentines of the most approved stamp; and our friend Wilder, we perceive, displays a gigantic moss-rose, with a bachelor just emerging from its petals, as an indication of what may be found within. Ladies on the sunny side of thirty, and some, if that be possible, on the shady side, are tripping hither and thither in search of crow-quills, red ink and love-wax; and the anniversary, in all human and inhuman probability, will be fully celebrated.β
***
ON THIS DAY IN 1924, the Eagle reported, βWASHINGTON β The flow of immigrants into Brooklyn will be cut almost 50 percent if the new Johnson Immigration Bill, now pending before the House of Representatives, is passed by this Congress. Its passage would undoubtedly have a marked political, if not economic, effect upon the boro with its foreign-born population of 700,000. The Johnson Bill was framed by the House Immigration Committee with the intent of restricting alien immigration even more than now under the 3 percent quota law. This new law would cause a sharp geographical shift in the sources from which this country now draws its alien population. By computing the quota upon the United States census of 1890 instead of 1910 as of present, the American immigration bars would be raised higher against such countries as Italy, Poland, Russia, Austria, Greece and Turkey, whereas the immigrants from such countries as Great Britain, Germany, France and Scandinavia would find the new act working comparatively in their favor. The enemies of the bill declare it represents racial and religious discrimination; that it shows a preference for Nordic races and is aimed at the people of Eastern and Southern Europe.β