November 25: ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
ON THIS DAY IN 1870, a Brooklyn Daily Eagle editorial said, “Our paper this afternoon is considerably occupied by a narration of the many ways in which Brooklyn observed Thanksgiving yesterday. It will be seen that the forms which religion and recreation took pretty well reflected the many phases of conviction and impulse of which our people are compounded. The record is a not uninteresting and a not inadequate exhibition in action of the varied and energetic force that goes by the name of American character. Of the observance, it can be truly said, that if it was varied, it was also general. Probably, no nationality and no social condition woven into the woof of our life failed to feel the quietude, if not the inspiration, of the occasion. It touched the stomach or the sentiment of us all. The population of this land, with fewer holidays than any other population, always make much of them when they come, not more because they are few, than because the intense existence in being and business here impels us to prosecute even our pleasures with electric zest.”
***
ON THIS DAY IN 1917, the Eagle reported, “In the opinion of Police Commissioner Arthur Woods, the improper use of habit-forming drugs can never be adequately suppressed until the National Government itself takes over their manufacture and distribution. Commissioner Woods made this statement in a letter sent yesterday to G.E. Fletcher, Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in Washington, in answer to a letter requesting suggestions as to what legislation is needed to give the Government proper control of the manufacture and distribution of habit-forming drugs. That the Government may not be prepared to take the step he advocates and that Constitutional objections might bar the way Commissioner Woods admits, but he states it as his belief that the absolute suppression of the illicit traffic in drugs can be accomplished in no other way. ‘The menace now is great, and is likely to become greater,’ he says in his letter. ‘Regulative measures can only mitigate the evil — they cannot eradicate it when profits to the illicit dealer are large and evasion of the law so easy.’”