State Courts Liberalize Distancing Requirements, But Keep Mask Requirements
Since my last report two weeks ago, the number of judges and court staff testing positive for COVID-19 has, thankfully, continued to plummet, enabling us, on the operational side of our house, to prioritize the restoration of in-person proceedings and services, including jury trials, and to put all of our focus on resuming full-court operations, so that we can clear out our backlogs and return to the outstanding progress of the Excellence Initiative, when we were managing our dockets and resolving cases efficiently and expeditiously.
And toward that end, I’m pleased to announce that, effective today, we are implementing 3-foot physical distancing for participants in criminal jury trials statewide. Up to this point, one of the main obstacles to our ability to resume full operations has been the 6-foot social distancing guideline, which has prevented us from using our courtrooms to maximum capacity. In many of our criminal court buildings, 6-foot distancing has necessitated the use of multiple courtrooms in order to conduct a single criminal jury trial, and that has significantly limited the number of trials we have been able to conduct.
Given the important constitutional rights and interests at stake in criminal matters, including the right to a speedy trial for individuals accused of crimes, many of whom are now being detained while they wait for their day in court, it is most important that we be able to schedule the number of jury trials actually needed to move our dockets as efficiently as possible in order to promptly adjudicate these important cases and clear away the large pandemic-related backlogs that have built up in many of our courts.