January 19: ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
ON THIS DAY IN 1902, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reported, “With the coming of the new year, the coronation of King Edward and Queen Alexandra June 26 is the one topic uppermost in the minds of the people of London. For while the brilliant ceremony will be one of world-wide interest, it is in London that the great and glorious scenes associated with the event will be carried on. The days of mourning for the dead Queen [Victoria] are past, and the metropolis of the empire has set itself the stupendous task of eclipsing all previous efforts so far as spectacular displays go. London in June will be the scene of such magnificent pageantry and representation of power and might as will eclipse the glories of the jubilee celebrations of 1887 and 1897, and will provide, for all who have the privilege of seeing it, a vision of splendor unequaled in recent times.”
***
ON THIS DAY IN 1939, the Eagle reported, “The city administration is highly resentful over Manhattan District Attorney Thomas E. Dewey’s claim that more than a million dollars of Independent Subway nickels were stolen, the Brooklyn Eagle learned from a source close to City Hall today. ‘Mr. Dewey will not and cannot establish an aggregate theft of as much as $20,000, let alone $1,300,000. It is preposterous to talk about 24,000,000 nickels having been stolen,’ the informant said. Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, it is said, does not appreciate the impression created by Mr. Dewey that there was any such laxity in the city subway management. … This paper’s source declared that John H. Delaney, chairman of the Board of Transportation, which built and runs the city subway, recognizes that there has been some negligence, but in statements made to the press on Tuesday he minimized the loss. He said a steal-proof mechanism was being installed on the Independent System. … Mr. Delaney is not sympathetic with the District Attorney’s intention to send the nickel pilferers to prison, the Brooklyn Eagle informant declared, adding he was content to try the suspected employees and, if they were found guilty, to dismiss them from the city service. ‘They are poor workingmen,’ he is reported to have said to a friend, ‘and the loss of their civil service status and of their jobs and the disgrace for their families is sufficient punishment.’”