Brooklyn Boro

Peter Liang’s sentence reduced, will not face prison time

Former NYPD officer now gets probation in Akai Gurley stairwell shooting case

April 19, 2016 By Colleen Long Associated Press
Peter Liang. AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File
Share this:

A former police officer convicted in the shooting death of an unarmed man in a darkened stairwell was spared prison time Tuesday, and a judge reduced his manslaughter conviction to a lesser charge.

Peter Liang was sentenced to five years’ probation and 800 hours of community service in the 2014 shooting of Akai Gurley, who was walking down a stairway in a public housing complex when the rookie officer fired a bullet into the dark — by accident after being startled, he said. The bullet ricocheted and killed Gurley, 28.

“Given the defendant’s background and how remorseful he is, it would not be necessary to incarcerate the defendant to have a just sentence in this case,” Brooklyn state Supreme Court Justice Danny Chun said in sentencing Liang, also 28.

DAILY TOP BROOKLYN NEWS
News for those who live, work and play in Brooklyn and beyond

A jury had convicted him in February of a manslaughter charge carrying up to 15 years in prison. But Chun on Tuesday reduced the offense to criminally negligent homicide, which carries up to four years in prison.

Brooklyn prosecutors recommended Liang serve no time, based on his record and the circumstances of the trial. They suggested five years of probation, six months of home confinement and 500 hours of community service.

“My office vigorously prosecuted Peter Liang for manslaughter because the evidence established that his conduct was criminal and the rule of law demanded that he be held accountable for his actions in taking Akai Gurley’s life,” Brooklyn DA Kenneth Thompson said in a statement.  “The jury, the voice of the Brooklyn community, agreed and returned the verdict of guilty against Mr. Liang, who is now a convicted felon, forfeited his career as a police officer and must now always live with the fact that he recklessly caused Mr. Gurley’s death. While our sentencing recommendation was fair under the unique circumstances of this case, we respectfully disagree with the judge’s decision to reduce the jury’s verdict and will fight to reverse it on appeal.”

Some members of Gurley’s family said they felt betrayed by Thompson’s recommendation and had hoped Chun would sentence Liang to prison anyway.

The shooting happened in a year of debate nationwide about police killings of black men. Activists have looked to Liang’s trial as a counterweight to cases in which grand juries have declined to indict officers, including the cases of Michael Brown in Missouri and Eric Garner in New York. Like Gurley, Brown and Garner were black and unarmed. Liang is Chinese-American.

Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson cautioned that Liang’s case shouldn’t be commingled with others. But relatives of other New Yorkers killed in police encounters had joined Gurley’s family outside court during the trial to call for police accountability.

Meanwhile, Liang’s supporters have said he has been made a scapegoat for past injustices.

The missteps made by Liang after the shooting were on display during the trial, including that he failed to aid the bleeding Gurley as the dying man’s girlfriend frantically performed CPR. A neighbor called out instructions delivered from a 911 operator on the phone. Liang and his partner, who wasn’t charged and testified during the trial, said they didn’t help because they weren’t well-trained. The admissions prompted an internal investigation into training by Commissioner William Bratton.

Liang’s attorneys had sought to get the verdict tossed out based on juror misconduct, but the judge refused. Liang was fired after the verdict. So was his partner.


Leave a Comment


Leave a Comment